HUMBERSIDE · SELECTED PUBLIC FINDINGS
Humberside: 3,336 alleged Section 172 cases reported in 2025
Humberside reports 3,336 cases under the requested category of alleged Section 172 failures referred, charged or otherwise proceeded with in 2025. Not a conviction count.
What the 3,336 figure actually represents
Humberside supplies 3,336 for 2025 under the question asking for alleged failures to provide driver information recorded as referred, charged or otherwise proceeded with. The table repeats that requested category without defining the precise procedural stage. It is not a conviction or MS90 endorsement count and is not described here as confirmed prosecutions.
Why this matters to a motorist
A request to identify the driver is a distinct part of the notice process. The reported case category illustrates why the response task deserves attention, but cannot predict an individual outcome. Start with the document received, follow its instructions and retain evidence of any response. The free document checker and procedural guides below help identify the next information to review.
Section 172 and reminder totals withheld
The force says answering Questions 2 and 3 would require manual checks of tens of thousands of offences and relies on the cost limit. No total for Section 172 requirements or reminders is supplied. This is withheld information, not zero activity or confirmation that reminders are not sent. Combined NIP and Section 172 documents are not expressly confirmed.
A precise portal launch date, unresolved functions
The force says its Clarity (Polaris) Road Safety Portal went live on 11 June 2024. It does not distinguish admission from nomination, identify eligible notices or rule out an earlier online service. The disclosed launch date alone cannot establish what a particular recipient could do online.
Counting and comparison limits
The response does not expressly define camera versus officer coverage, offence types, year assignment or the counting unit behind the case total. The annual notice and case series are not linked cohorts. Do not divide them to estimate a prosecution rate. The force expressly cautions against comparison with other forces because systems and local recording practices differ.
No nomination timing measure supplied
Question 6 is answered “No information held”. It gives no average, median or service guarantee for issuing a notice after nomination. Full annual series, calculations and the unresolved reporting questions remain in the professional analysis.
A practical question for fleet and compliance teams
Can your procedure distinguish a driver information request, a nomination and an alleged failure case without assuming a reminder or a particular portal function? Professional research helps identify the source support and evidence gaps behind those assumptions. It does not predict enforcement outcomes.
Check the evidence behind your notice handling procedure.
Professional access brings together the annual series, source definitions and evidence gaps. Tell us up to three forces and the procedure you need to review. We confirm coverage and scope before terms and payment. Individual access is £495 per year, team access £1,500 and organisation licences from £3,000.
Received a notice yourself?
Force statistics cannot decide your case. Identify the document, follow its response instructions and retain evidence.
Need a structured preparation plan?
Start with the free document checker. If you want the optional motorist Case File / Response Plan, review what the £29 pack includes before buying. It is separate from professional research access and does not submit a response to the police.
See the optional £29 motorist pack →Portal address supplied by the force
Open the police Road Safety Portal →. Use only where the instructions on your notice direct you to this service. NoticeReady is independent of the portal.
Source and publication limits
Humberside Police 01/FOI/26/007853/B, dated 14 September 2026, page 3 image table for Question 4 and pages 2 to 3 qualifications.
This page publishes selected qualified findings. It does not reproduce the complete series, original correspondence or professional calculations. NoticeReady does not claim exclusive ownership of police facts. Cross-force comparisons require matching coverage and definitions.
Editorial use and corrections
Please credit NoticeReady Research Team and link to this page when citing our analysis. Preserve its qualifications. For corrections or a scoped professional enquiry, contact hello@noticeready.co.uk. NoticeReady is independent of police and courts and is not a law firm.