CAMBRIDGESHIRE · SELECTED PUBLIC FINDINGS
Cambridgeshire NIP reminders: 15,826 recorded in 2025
Cambridgeshire camera notice evidence: 15,826 NIP reminders in 2025, combined Section 172 documents and the disclosed StarPortal response functions.
What the selected figures establish
Cambridgeshire reports 15,826 NIP reminders in 2025 for camera detected speeding and red light offences. The label is the force’s own. It does not identify unique drivers, repeat reminders or subsequent nominees. The count cannot establish how many recipients later faced proceedings.
One document, two functions
The force expressly says its NIP and Section 172 requirements are combined and cannot be counted separately. Each reported notice includes a driver information requirement. Adding the answers to Questions 1 and 2 would double count. The response does not expressly resolve whether the series includes later notices following nominations. Officer detected offences are outside the stated camera scope.
Online admission and nomination: what the force confirms
The response says both online admission and nomination became available from mid September 2024 through StarPortal. It does not specify which notice types qualify or any exceptions. This is the force’s historical statement, not a live service test or a guarantee that a particular notice can be answered online.
Received a reminder or need to name a driver?
Start with the document you actually received. Check its instructions and response date, use the route it specifies and keep evidence of submission. If access fails or eligibility is unclear, use the contact details on the notice. These aggregate figures cannot determine the validity or outcome of your case.
No proceedings figures supplied
Question 4 is answered “No information held”. That is not a finding of zero prosecutions, convictions or MS90 endorsements. The response does not describe which systems were searched. It also says no requested average or median nomination processing report is held.
What remains unresolved
The figures are expressly described as an unaudited snapshot from live systems, subject to the interpretation of the person extracting them. Year assignment, initial versus subsequent notices, reminder counting rules and the scope of the proceedings search require clarification. Annual movements cannot establish that introducing the portal changed compliance.
What a fleet or compliance team should review
Check whether your procedure distinguishes admission from nomination, records the relevant force and notice type, retains submission evidence and gives staff a fallback if a portal cannot be used. A missing outcome statistic must not be treated as an absence of enforcement. These are review questions, not claims about your organisation’s current compliance.
Check the evidence behind your notice handling procedure.
Professional access brings together the annual series, source definitions and evidence gaps. Tell us up to three forces and the procedure you need to review. We confirm coverage and scope before terms and payment. Individual access is £495 per year, team access £1,500 and organisation licences from £3,000.
Received a notice yourself?
Force statistics cannot decide your case. Identify the document, follow its response instructions and retain evidence.
Need a structured preparation plan?
Start with the free document checker. If you want the optional motorist Case File / Response Plan, review what the £29 pack includes before buying. It is separate from professional research access and does not submit a response to the police.
See the optional £29 motorist pack →StarPortal address supplied by the force
Open the police StarPortal →. Use only where the instructions on your notice direct you to this service. NoticeReady is independent of the portal.
Source and publication limits
Cambridgeshire Constabulary FOI FOI2026/07590, dated 14 September 2026, answers 1 to 6 and data quality qualification.
This page publishes selected qualified findings. It does not reproduce the complete series, original correspondence or professional calculations. NoticeReady does not claim exclusive ownership of police facts. Cross-force comparisons require matching coverage and definitions.
Editorial use and corrections
Please credit NoticeReady Research Team and link to this page when citing our analysis. Preserve its qualifications. For corrections or a scoped professional enquiry, contact hello@noticeready.co.uk. NoticeReady is independent of police and courts and is not a law firm.