TWO DIFFERENT LEGAL CLOCKS
NIP 14-day rule vs Section 172: do not confuse the deadlines
A Notice of Intended Prosecution and a Section 172 driver-information requirement are often printed together. They perform different legal functions and ordinarily involve different time periods.
Checked against primary legal sources for England and Wales · Updated 13 August 2026 · How we review content
The 14-day rule ordinarily concerns service of the first NIP on the registered keeper for offences to which section 1 applies. A Section 172 requirement separately asks for driver information and ordinarily requires a response within 28 days of service. A possible NIP timing issue does not make it safe to ignore the Section 172 request.
Check the 14 day dates instantly
Review the offence date, arrival date, delivery and registered keeper position without creating an account or uploading the notice.
A warning-of-prosecution rule focused on the first notice served on the registered keeper, subject to statutory exceptions.
A separate requirement to provide driver information, beginning with the day the requirement is served.
Separate the two deadlines before you respond
- Keep every page of the notice and the envelope.
- Record the offence date, notice date and actual arrival date.
- Check who was the registered keeper and the V5C address on the offence date.
- Answer any Section 172 request truthfully by the deadline stated on it.
What is the NIP 14-day rule?
For offences covered by section 1 of the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988, the driver must ordinarily have been warned at the time or a notice must be served on the registered keeper within 14 days of the offence. The rule is about warning of a possible prosecution; it is not a universal deadline applying to every later notice.
The first notice to the registered keeper is usually the critical document. A later notice sent to a nominated driver, company-car user or hirer may arrive after day 14 without that fact alone invalidating the proceedings.
Is posting the NIP within 14 days enough?
Posting is not always service. With ordinary first-class post, proof of correct addressing, prepayment and posting can create a rebuttable presumption of delivery in the ordinary course of post. It does not make the posting date alone decisive.
In Gidden v Chief Constable of Humberside, the High Court held that credible evidence of actual late delivery could rebut that presumption. The delivery method, envelope and evidence of the arrival date can therefore matter.
The Section 172 requirement is separate. Never ignore that request because you believe the NIP was late.
What is the Section 172 28-day requirement?
Section 172 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 allows an authorised request for information identifying the driver. The recipient is ordinarily required to provide the requested information within 28 days beginning with the day the requirement is served, unless a statutory qualification applies.
This obligation is separate from the NIP. Failing to provide the information can result in a separate allegation, commonly carrying six penalty points on conviction. Do not withhold a truthful response merely because you believe the NIP may have been late.
Which dates and documents should I check?
- Date of the alleged offence
- Date printed on the NIP and Section 172 requirement
- Date the documents actually arrived
- Name and address on the V5C registration document
- The V5C document-reference date, especially after a move or vehicle purchase
- Whether the vehicle was leased, hired, company-owned or recently transferred
- Any online confirmation, acknowledgement or proof of posting
What commonly changes the 14-day analysis?
The result can depend on who was recorded as registered keeper, whether DVLA records were current, whether the police could with reasonable diligence identify the keeper in time, and the statutory evidence about posting and service. A delay caused by an old address, recent vehicle transfer, lease company or employer may explain why a driver receives paperwork after 14 days.
Keep the original documents and obtain case-specific advice before relying on a late-service argument. NoticeReady can organise dates and explain the process, but it cannot decide whether a statutory exception applies to your evidence.
What if I am unsure who was driving?
Do not guess. Make prompt, genuine enquiries and preserve a record of them: calendars, messages, receipts, work records, vehicle access, photographs and journey information may assist. The applicable legal test depends on the recipient and facts.
If the deadline is close, has passed, or court papers have arrived, speak promptly to an SRA-regulated motoring solicitor before deciding how to proceed.
Turn your paperwork into a clear next-step checklist.
Preserve the notice, dates and response record
Build a notice chronology, deadline record, document checklist and concise solicitor briefing in NoticeReady Case. It does not determine whether the notice is valid.
QUICK ANSWERS
Frequently asked questions
Does a late NIP mean I can ignore the Section 172 form?
No. The NIP warning and the Section 172 driver-information requirement are separate. A possible issue with the first does not safely remove the obligation to answer the second truthfully within its stated period.
Does the driver personally have to receive a NIP within 14 days?
Not necessarily. The statutory focus is ordinarily the first notice served on the registered keeper. A later notice to a nominated driver may arrive outside 14 days.
When does the Section 172 28-day period start?
The legislation ordinarily refers to 28 days beginning with the day on which the requirement is served. Read the notice carefully, record when it arrived and avoid leaving the response until the final day.
What if the NIP went to my old address?
Check the V5C address and document-reference date. An old or recently changed keeper address can materially affect the service analysis, but it does not make it safe to ignore a driver-information request that has reached you.